Schools are complicated structures, and high performance design covers a broad and diverse range of disciplines and choices. Schools are unique buildings house one-fifth of California's population: almost six million children and more than 200,000 teachers and support staff every day. There are few settings besides a school classroom in which twenty to thirty people occupy such a small space or work on such a wide a range of activities. Occupant density is approximately four times as great as a typical office building. Schools also include many "special use" areas such as laboratories, art studios, industrial shops, duplication facilities, and gymnasiums.

Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) is a broad term that addresses the complete spectrum of indoor environmental factors: light quality, air quality (including temperature, humidity, odors, and pollutants), and acoustics. Recognizing that the primary goal of school programs is to educate students, it is important to emphasize how good IEQ is essential to these educational goals.

There is now considerable empirical research explicitly connecting high performance building characteristics and student productivity.

Students in classrooms that are quiet, well lit, and properly ventilated with healthy air will learn faster because they are more comfortable, can see and hear better, and are less distracted. Suboptimal lighting, deficient acoustics, and poor indoor air quality are barriers to education. High performance schools remove these barriers, allowing teachers and students to work under the best possible conditions.

Discussed below are the primary areas of concern affecting student health and productivity: daylighting, indoor air quality, acoustics, commissioning, and maintenance. For more information on any of these items, please consult BPM Volume II: Design.

Back to top


Daylighting

It is well known that light has profound effects on humans. New research shows a direct link between daylighting and increased learning in students.

In a 1999 study , the Heschong Mahone Group found a statistically compelling connection between daylighting and student performance. It isolates daylighting as an illumination source, and separates illumination effects from other qualities associated with daylighting from windows.
Read More button

These benefits could be caused by a variety of effects including: increased visibility, improved student health, elevated mood, better behavior, reduction in the effects of daylight deprivation, and higher arousal levels. Around half of a school utility bill in California pays for lighting. Because of this, lighting systems are often identified as a priority in energy-conserving measures and programs.

Daylighting saves energy, and therefore money, in two ways. Most obviously, lights that are off are not using energy. But lights that are off are also not generating heat, allowing the air conditioners to be downsized, work less, and save energy.

As straightforward as these advantages appear, they do not just happen. The design team must work together using the principles of integrated design to maximize the effectiveness of daylighting systems, and the building occupants need to be educated about how the systems work. Your lighting options range from no-cost and low-cost choices to sophisticated state-of-the-art systems. Communicate your goals clearly with your design team, and arrive at a solution that fits your budget.

For more detailed information and best practice design strategies, see the Daylighting Chapter in Part II of the BPM Volume II: Design.

Back to top


Air Quality

Indoor air quality is vitally important to schools today. Nothing less than the health of the students and staff are at stake. For years, news reports, scientific inquiries, and educational efforts have communicated the symptoms, causes, and solutions of indoor air quality problems.

Indoor pollutants such as chemical toxins and biological agents can create significant health risks and adverse learning conditions. Pollutants can affect a range of body systems and impact health, learning, productivity, and self-esteem. Health effects can be both transient and long-term, and may not affect all of classroom occupants in the same way. Symptoms range from mild discomfort and the perception of bothersome odors to severe illness and permanent injury. Health effects include increased rates of infectious diseases (e.g., influenza and the common cold), eye and respiratory irritation, allergies and asthma, chronic sinusitis, headaches, and an array of other respiratory diseases. Environmental factors such as light quality, acoustics, and overcrowding may also contribute to, or create, similar problems.

A key point for the concern over Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) problems in schools is that children are believed to be much more vulnerable than adults to environmental contaminants and injury . Relative to their size, children's breathing rates and metabolic rates are significantly faster than adults. Hence, children will breath in and metabolize greater doses of airborne toxins than adults in the same environment. Because children's bodies are actively growing, they absorb and retain more of these toxins. Their defense mechanisms are less effective to prevent contaminants and infectious organisms from entering their bodies, and their immune systems are less able to respond when agents do enter.

Exposures to common molds and damp environments have been associated with childhood respiratory illnesses, such as persistent wheeze, attacks of shortness of breath, and bronchitis. Molds typically cause health problems when large quantities of airborne spores are inhaled.

Across the country, student and staff populations have seen sharp increases in both the prevalence and severity of asthma. Rates in urban areas have been especially high. This means an increasing number of students and staff are coming into the classroom with already highly sensitized respiratory systems.

In addition, IEQ has an indirect, yet profound, effect on learning. Inadequate ventilation leads to the buildup of carbon dioxide and other indoor pollutants, which are often associated with discomfort and the inability to concentrate. Exposures to volatile organic compounds (VOC's) and other indoor pollutants can cause a range of acute symptoms at relatively low concentrations. Eye and respiratory irritation are the most common complaint. These indoor contaminants can also cause headaches, mental confusion, behavioral problems, and fatigue—all of which diminish students' ability to concentrate or assimilate information. Among asthmatics, the increased need for medication (often with sedating side effects), exacerbations of asthma attacks, and related absences further undermine education in affected classrooms.

A recent report from Lawrence Berkeley National Labs summarized the history of school investigations initiated by health symptoms and/or environmental complaints.


School districts have the power to control their indoor air quality. Because of the diverse range of pollutant sources and the potentially high costs of corrective actions, schools should focus on prevention. Many no-cost and low-cost approaches are available to prevent problems. The key elements are:

  • Maintenance–Maintenance practices are key to preventing indoor air quality problems. Regularly inspecting and maintaining HVAC systems ensures adequate ventilation rates. Cleaning up spills and moisture avoids mold and microbial growth. Regular carpet and floor cleanings minimize surface dust. Also, integrated pest management techniques minimize the use of toxic materials.
  • Proper SitingThis minimizes exterior sources of pollution and keeps air intakes away from pollutant sources such as parking lots or building exhaust vents.
  • Appropriate materialsPollutants can be eliminated at the source by using low-emitting, nontoxic building materials. Pressed wood products (particle board), carpets, paints, adhesives, furniture, and wall-coverings have all traditionally contained toxins. In today's market, low-emitting alternatives are available for most building and finishing materials.
  • Effectively Designed and Commissioned Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC)The building code specifies minimum ventilation rates for schools. Ventilation is critical to removing indoor pollutants from the classroom. Unfortunately, many schools never meet these guidelines. A 1995 California Energy Commission report found that schools consistently had sub-standard ventilation rates, and 1 in 3 classrooms were ventilated at less than half the legal minimums.

The BPM Volume III: Criteria and the BPM Volume II: Design cover all of the design issues relevant to ensuring superior indoor air quality.

Back to top


Acoustics

When noise levels in the classroom are too high, students and teachers lose the ability to intelligibly understand each other. Typical sources are outdoor sounds (traffic, airplanes, etc.), loud air conditioning and ventilation systems, and internal noise from other school spaces. The teacher and student's inability to hear one another directly affects student performance. Teachers must sometimes resort to shutting off the ventilation systems because they are too loud, which can have the unfortunate side effects of reducing indoor air quality and thermal comfort.

Students are particularly susceptible to the ill-affects of background noise. Age, instances of hearing loss, lack of language proficiency, and individual hearing preferences can all affect how well a given student can hear in the classroom. Approximately 15% of children are estimated to have a slight hearing loss, and investigations of school records has linked hearing losses with lack of progression through school. Typically, children do not fully develop the ability to sort sounds from background noise until they are teenagers.

Recognition of the widespread acoustic problems in America are spurring developments of a national minimum acoustical standard for classrooms which may be enforced under the auspices of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Typical low-first cost air-conditioning systems used throughout California do not meet the recommended levels for background noise. Location of HVAC equipment, duct design and internal surface choices all contribute to the overall acoustic performance of the space.

Back to top


Commissioning

The process of quality control and verification in public buildings is known as commissioning. It is a powerful tool because it can prove if the designers and contractors have done what you have hired them to do. The district then has the authority to make them fix it up front instead of dealing with maintenance problems or poor performance down the road.

In many ways, commissioning is similar to a "test run" or "systems check." It tests, verifies, and fine tunes the performance of key building systems so that the highest levels of performance are achieved. Correctly implemented it should improve the building delivery process, increase systems reliability, improve energy performance, ensure good indoor environmental quality, and improve operation and maintenance of the facility.

All building systems can be commissioned. The important components are:

Documentation. Ensure that all required documentation has been provided, such as the design intent, and operating protocols for all building systems.

Thought Transfer. Prepare comprehensive operation and maintenance manuals, coupled with training of building operations staff.

Installation checks. Checking installed equipment to ensure that all associated equipment and accessories are in place.

Operational checks. Verify and document that the system is performing as expected, and that all of the sensors and other system control devices are calibrated properly, and

Ongoing monitoring. Properly implemented such a plan will ensure that a new school starts its life cycle at the highest performance level possible. However, building commissioning is not yet common practice. It is therefore important that areas of responsibility in the process, particularly who will bear the cost of correcting conditions that do not meet specifications, are clearly spelled out in the very beginning.

For more detailed information please see BPM Volume V: Commissioning .

Back to top


Maintenance

Effective maintenance is fundamentally important to sustaining the performance of all building systems. Student health and productivity can be affected when building systems fail to operate as designed. Sub-standard maintenance usually results from a combination of factors. First, maintenance budgets are often the first to be reduced or eliminated when money becomes tight. Second, minimal thought transfer from the designers and contractors to the building staff is typically completed. Finally, schools lose their institutional knowledge of the building systems as turnover and lack of communication occurs throughout the life of the building.

High Performance Schools are maintenance friendly. Building systems are easy to maintain, and reduced operating costs from energy-efficient design frees money that could be directed to support maintenance efforts. Additionally, high performance design urges the clear identification of roles, responsibilities, and budget to ensure that important maintenance information is transferred to the building occupants and not lost in the rush between construction and occupancy.

For more detailed information please see BPM Volume IV: M&O .

 

Back to top

> Home > CHPS Overview > CHPS Schools > Training and Events
> Publications and Resources > CHPS Membership